Abstract
In Iran, claims concerning administrative responsibility of State are dealt with in two different courts. When the Court of Administrative Justice (“CAJ”) has ascertained the breach of law, the Ordinary Court determines the extent of the damage suffered. This duality in judicial procedure ...
Read More
In Iran, claims concerning administrative responsibility of State are dealt with in two different courts. When the Court of Administrative Justice (“CAJ”) has ascertained the breach of law, the Ordinary Court determines the extent of the damage suffered. This duality in judicial procedure is the relic of the Law on the State Council approved in 1960, which seemed logical given the constraints of that institution, which was contrary to the constitutional rules. However, the CAJ is identified in the Constitution of the I.R.I as part of the country's judiciary and the article 173 of the Constitution grants the jurisdiction over complaints, grievances, and objections of the people against the State. Accordingly, this duality is not compatible with the current judicial structure of the country and it aggravates slowness of judicial process, and increases the complexity of the judicial system and its costs, without any clear necessity.
Hasan Lotfi
Abstract
الف) فارسی کتابها - پاهکیده، امین، (1392)، تشریفات ویژه رسیدگی به دعاوی دولت در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران، تهران: جنگل. - رفیعی، ...
Read More
الف) فارسی کتابها - پاهکیده، امین، (1392)، تشریفات ویژه رسیدگی به دعاوی دولت در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران، تهران: جنگل. - رفیعی، علی، (1390)، اجرای احکام مدنی علیه دولت، تهران: فکرسازان. - شهری، غلامرضا، (1393)، حقوق ثبت اسناد و املاک، چاپ چهلم، تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی. - طباطبایی مؤتمنی، منوچهر، (1390)، حقوق اداری، چاپ شانزدهم، تهران: سمت. - مردانی، نادر و محمد قهرمان، (1390)، اجرای احکام مدنی و احکام و اسناد لازم‌الاجرای خارجی در ایران، تهران: میزان. - مهاجری، علی، (1392)، شرح جامع قانون اجرای احکام مدنی، جلد اول، چاپ هفتم، تهران: فکرسازان. مقالهها - رستمی، ولی و کیومرث سپهری، (1389)، «اجرای احکام مدنی علیه اشخاص حقوقی حقوق عمومی؛ موانع و راهکارها»، حقوق، دوره 40، شماره 2. - مردانی، نادر و محمدمجتبی رودی جانی، (1385)، «استثنائات وارده بر توقیف اموال در قانون اجرای احکام مدنی»، مجله کانون وکلا، شماره 192 و 193. ب) فرانسوی کتابها - Auby, Jean Marie; Bon, Pierre et Jean Bernard Auby, (2003), Droit administratif des biens, 4e éd., Dalloz. - Batselé, Didier; Mortier, Tony et Martine Scarcez, (2010), Manuel de droit administratif, Bruxelles: Bruylant. - De Laubadére et Yves Gaudemet, (1998), Traité de droit administratif, tome 2, 11e éd., L.G.D.J. - Long M., Weil P., Braibant G., Delvolvé P. et B. Genevois, (2005), Les grands arrêts de la jurisprudence administrative, 15e éd., Dalloz. مقاله - Kolongele Eberande, Désiré-Cashmir, (2014), “Immunité d’exécution, obstacle à l’exécution forcée en droit OHADA contre les entreprises et personnes publiques?”, Revue Juridique et Politique des États Francophones, Vol.68, N.2. گزارش - Gaudemet, Yves et Laurent Deruy. (2004). Rapport de groupe de travail consacré à la valorisation des biens publics, L’institut de la gestion déléguée, Disponible en: http://www.fondationigd.org/files/pdf/La%20valorisation%20des%20proprietes%20publiques%206.pdf. ج) اسپانیایی کتابها - Almerco, Sara Ccopa. (2004). El Dominio Publico; Su Desafectacion, Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru. - Alzate Rios, Luis Carlos. (2011). Temas de Derecho Procesal Administrativo Contemporáneo, Universidad La Gran Colombia. - García, Esteban Corral y José Antonio López. (2006). Reglamento de Bienes de las Entidades Locales, 3.a Edicíon, Madrid: Wolters Kluwer Espaňa. - Gordillo, Agustín A. (1967). Derecho Administrativo de la Economía, Vol.1, Ediciones Macchi, Universidad La Gran Colombia. - Murillo, Roberto Jiménez. (2005) La Constitución Comentada; Análisis Artículo por Artículo, Editado por Walter Gutierrez, Gaceta Jurídica. - Navarro, Fernando Martos. (2005). Grupo B de Administración General de la Generalitat Valenciana, Vol.1, Sevilla: Editorial Mad. مقالهها - Alvarado Esquivel, Miguel de Jesús. (2008). “Puntos Críticos en la Ejecución de las Sentencias de Amparo”, La Ciencia del Derecho Procesal Constitucional; Estudios en Homenaje a Héctor Fix- Zamudio, Vol.5. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. - Gómez-Acebo y Pombo Abogados. (2012). “¿Embargabilidad ó Inembargabilidad de los Bienes Patrimoniales?” Revista de Estudios Locales, Núm.147. - Hutchinson, Tomás. (2007). “La Ejecución de Sentencias Contra el Estado en Argentina,” en: Jorge Fernández Ruiz (coord.), Contencioso Administrativo, Culturas y Sistemas Jurídicos Comparados, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. - Puigpelar, Oriol Mir. (1999) “¿El Fin de la Inembargabilidad de los Bienes Patrimoniales de las Administraciones Públicas?” Autonomies, Núm.25.
Abbas-ali Kadkhodaei; Moslem Aghaei Togh
Volume 14, Issue 38 , March 2013, , Pages 77-99
Abstract
Non-delegation Doctrine is one of the traditional principles of
constitutional law and more or less recognized by constitutions of another
countries around the world. There is not any agreement between scholars
concerning the basis of this doctrine; for some the doctrine is based on the
principle ...
Read More
Non-delegation Doctrine is one of the traditional principles of
constitutional law and more or less recognized by constitutions of another
countries around the world. There is not any agreement between scholars
concerning the basis of this doctrine; for some the doctrine is based on the
principle of delegate poteatas non potest delegaie, for some others it is
based on the principle of separation of powers and for the rest, it is the
principle of representative democracy that constitutes the basis of the
doctrine. Thus, many authors have mistaken about the basis of the
doctrine and consequently failed to capture its true meaning. Guardian
Council occasionally in her opinions about legislative bills has taken this
approach and declared them as unconstitutional. Identifying the principle
of supremacy of the constitution as the basis of the non-delegation
doctrine will help us find out its true meaning: Parliament cannot delegate
her law-making power to other branches or entities. Such a delegation
will disturb the political structure established by the constitution and
hence will devastate the principle of the supremacy of constitution.
